Analytics preferences

Google Analytics is optional. Accepting lets us measure page use and successful quote requests without contact details. Advertising storage remains off. Read our privacy policy.

Skip to main content

Aircraft decision guide

Pilatus PC-24 vs Challenger 300

A midsize-to-super-midsize decision: the Pilatus PC-24 combines a flexible cabin and cargo door with varied airfield capability, while the Challenger 300 adds a wider, taller cabin and more published range.

Compare another pair

Direct answer

The practical difference

Start with the Pilatus PC-24 when flexible seating, cargo-door access or airfield fit carries more weight. Start with the Challenger 300 for a wider, taller cabin and additional range margin. Compare the proposed layouts, baggage loading, runway calculations and written prices.

Cabin and performance

The differences that shape the trip

Published model references support initial planning. Variant, completion, payload, weather, reserves and route assumptions differ; confirm every figure for the proposed tail.

Pilatus PC-24
Typical seats
6-seat executive, 8-seat double-club or up to 10-passenger commuter-style layouts
Cabin length
23 ft
Cabin width
5 ft 7 in
Cabin height
5 ft 1 in
Standing room
Compare cabin height with each traveler's standing-room needs
Lavatory
Confirm lavatory type and privacy on the proposed aircraft
Range
1,800 nm earlier reference; up to 2,000 nm with six passengers or 2,040 nm with four passengers on current aircraft
Cruise speed
Up to 440 KTAS
Runway planning
Exact-tail takeoff and landing calculation required for both airports
Baggage
90 cu ft without partition; approximately 51 cu ft with partition
Challenger 300
Typical seats
Typically 8–9 executive passengers; selected approved layouts can accommodate 10
Cabin length
Approximately 23 ft 8 in passenger area; 28 ft 7 in cockpit-divider-to-pressure-bulkhead envelope
Cabin width
7 ft 2 in
Cabin height
6 ft 1 in
Standing room
6 ft 1 in flat-floor cabin; standing room for many travelers
Lavatory
Enclosed aft lavatory in reviewed typical layouts
Range
Approximately 3,100 nm
Cruise speed
Up to approximately 470 KTAS
Runway planning
Exact-tail takeoff and landing calculation required for both airports
Baggage
Approximately 106 cu ft

Specification sources

Figures are model-level planning references from the existing aircraft registry and its reviewed technical sources. Confirm the exact variant, cabin and flight calculation for the proposed aircraft.

Typical charter planning cost

Compare the same payment basis

These current house ranges are per billed flight hour, with a two-hour billable minimum. They are cabin-class planning ranges, not fixed model rate cards, live offers, or whole-trip totals.

Pilatus PC-24

Wire, before taxes and fees

$7,750–$10,800 / billed flight hour

U.S. domestic wire + 7.5% FET

$8,331–$11,610

U.S. domestic card + 4%, then 7.5% FET

$8,665–$12,074

Challenger 300

Wire, before taxes and fees

$9,500–$13,000 / billed flight hour

U.S. domestic wire + 7.5% FET

$10,213–$13,975

U.S. domestic card + 4%, then 7.5% FET

$10,621–$14,534

How the math works

U.S. domestic examples add 7.5% Federal Excise Tax to the displayed hourly transportation range. Paying by card costs 4% more than paying by wire; the card example applies that adjustment before FET. Domestic segment tax and trip-specific positioning, airport, handling, catering, deicing and other charges are not included in these hourly examples.

Mission verdict

Which one for which mission?

Start with the Pilatus PC-24

Choose the Pilatus PC-24 profile when its flexible midsize cabin, cargo door, 90-cubic-foot baggage reference or airfield fit matters to the trip.

Start with the Challenger 300

Choose the Challenger 300 profile when the party benefits from a wider, taller flat-floor cabin, 106 cubic feet of in-flight-accessible baggage or additional published range.

Charter arranger and carrier disclosure

Jet Partners acts as a charter services arranger under 14 CFR Part 295. Jet Partners is not a direct air carrier, does not operate aircraft, and does not exercise operational control. The properly licensed direct air carrier identified for the trip operates the flight and retains operational control. Aircraft, availability, itinerary, price, taxes, payment, fees, and terms are confirmed in the written proposal.

Buyer questions

Frequently asked questions

How do the Pilatus PC-24 and Challenger 300 cabins compare?

The reviewed Pilatus PC-24 reference is about 23 ft long, 5 ft 7 in wide and 5 ft 1 in high. The Challenger 300 reference is about 23 ft 8 in through the passenger area, 7 ft 2 in wide and 6 ft 1 in high. Layout and usable space vary by aircraft.

Which has more published baggage space?

The Pilatus PC-24 reference lists 90 cubic feet without its partition and approximately 51 cubic feet with the partition. The Challenger 300 reference lists approximately 106 cubic feet accessible in flight. Confirm compartment configuration, loading limits and bag dimensions for the proposed aircraft.

Do the Pilatus PC-24 and Challenger 300 use the same planning range?

No. The catalog classifies the Pilatus PC-24 as Midsize and the Challenger 300 as Super Midsize. Each uses its category's governed planning range, while the written proposal determines the trip price.

Compare available aircraft for your exact itinerary

Share the route, dates, party, bags, cabin priorities and payment method. We will request trip-specific options from direct air carriers.

Request a quote